Wonder vs Claude
Muse Wonder vs Claude Opus 5.5: price, benchmarks & access
Compare Muse Wonder and Claude Opus 5.5 with named reasoning settings, API prices, independent scores and practical coding evaluation criteria.
Last verified · Independent editorial guide
On the checked snapshot, Wonder and Claude Opus 5.5 have the same $4 input / $20 output list prices per million tokens. Artificial Analysis lists index scores of 52 and 58 respectively. Equal token rates do not imply equal cost per successful coding task.
Independent evaluation snapshot
| Model / reasoning | AA Intelligence Index | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Public API | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Wondermax | 52 | $4 | $20 | Yes | AA |
| Muse Wonder Fullmax | 56 | — | — | No | AA |
| Claude Opus 5.5max | 58 | $4 | $20 | Yes | AA |
Third-party evaluation · Artificial Analysis· Last verified
Scores: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 (higher is better). Prices: evaluator-listed USD per million tokens; rates and tiers can vary. Different reasoning settings are shown explicitly. No tests were run by this website.
Compare Opus 5.5, not an unspecified “Claude”
Editorial synthesis · Cited sources· Last verified
This page compares Wonder at max reasoning with Claude Opus 5.5 at max with default fallback. It does not make a claim about every Claude model or the monthly price of Claude’s consumer application.
For the same hypothetical 1 million uncached input tokens and 100,000 output tokens, both list-price token estimates are $6. Actual usage can diverge because the models may produce different lengths, make different tool calls or need different retries.
Coding quality needs the repository, not just the leaderboard
Editorial synthesis · Cited sources· Last verified
Use one representative change with a fixed task description and test suite. Give both agents equivalent permissions, relevant files and a clear stopping condition. Record whether the change passes tests without manual repair.
If your current Claude workflow already includes tools, permissions and review conventions, account for the effort of adapting that workflow to Wonder. If Wonder fits your existing provider stack, evaluate that advantage directly rather than translating it into an unsupported quality claim.
Full changes access, not the Opus comparison’s API price
Editorial synthesis · Cited sources· Last verified
Wonder Full is a separate Muse Code subscription option and has no listed per-token API price. Its independent index is included for context, but it is not a drop-in API configuration for Wonder.
The index can narrow the shortlist. Decide with the cost and reliability of completing your actual work; the larger score alone does not determine which toolchain you should adopt.
Frequently asked questions
Editorial synthesis · Cited sources· Last verified
Is Wonder cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5?
The checked list-price input and output token rates are the same. Total task cost can still differ with usage, caching, retries and tool charges.
Does this compare Claude subscriptions?
No. It compares the named API model and an independent benchmark snapshot. Consumer and coding subscriptions are separate products.
Sources and verification
Provider pricing, model capabilities and access are distinguished from independent evaluations. The date records an editorial check; data is not refreshed automatically.